Industrial Technology - Linked-in Industrial Technology - Twitter Industrial Technology - News Feed
Latest Issue

Beware of changes to your machinery

Beware of changes to your machinery

Neil Dyson of TUV SUD Product Service looks at the what 'substantial' change means in regard to machinery changes, and how this might impact on your CE declaration.

To meet the demands of technological change and competitive market pressures, many machinery end users must upgrade existing equipment and its interlinked infrastructure as the budget is not available to invest in new systems. However, if substantial changes are made, any existing Declarations of Conformity under the Machinery Directive may become invalid. This could require a new conformity assessment is carried out.

The functionality or performance of a machine will also be changed if it is interlinked with other equipment as part of an assembly. This is a common oversight machinery end-users make, as they do not realise that this creates a complex assembly that must be CE marked. However, machinery modification remains a grey area as the Machinery Directive contains no specific guidelines to advise machinery owners when a change is considered 'substantial', and they are consequently left to make their own conclusion.

There are two key areas of guidance to help machinery end-users identify if the modifications they have made will be considered substantial by the regu-latory authorities. This includes the HSE which states that if changes "are very substantial it may amount to being considered a 'new' machine (or assembly), for which you must undertake conformity assessment."

The HSE goes on to state that even if changes to machinery are not substantial, such as refurbishment, the owner must still ensure that it continues to meet the requirements of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER), as well as any other requirements which may also apply to the product.

What constitutes 'substantial' change?
To help identify what constitutes a 'substantial change', the HSE also outlines the different situations involving modifications to machinery where the requirements of the Machinery Directive are likely to apply and action must be taken:
* Machinery is modified so much that it should be considered as 'new' machinery. An example is the fitting of a computer control to a manually operated machine as it substantially changes its original mode of operation.
* Machinery refurbishment with a different safety package. If a substantially different safety strategy is put in place, even if the original machine was not CE marked because it pre-dated the Machinery Directive.
* An existing assembly of machines is modified. If it impacts substantially on the operation or safety of the whole assembly of machines.
* Machinery modified before it is first put into service. For machinery that is sold to an importer or a distributor who then modifies the machinery before it is put into service for the first time.

A second reference guide is the CEOC International document 'Modification of Machinery in Service - Guide for Inspection'. This is the only document I have seen which has explicit modification guidelines to help machinery owners decide what action to take. The good news is that it is also a relatively short document that gives some incisive answers to the best approach to take. As well as including an outline of the relevant legal aspects, the document gives clear guidance on what constitutes a 'non substantial' and a 'substantial' modification, helping the machinery owner to identify the correct path for them. It also outlines a useful procedure for the modification of machines that are both stand alone and within an assembly.

It defines substantial modifications in the following situations:
* If the original machinery has not been used as initial machinery, but as a source of parts in order to make something new, or if the original machinery is not identifiable any more (eg it is completely 'stripped down' and only few original parts remain).
* If the originally intended function and/or use has been changed by this modification in a way that new or other hazards are created which need a complete new risk assessment of the machinery.
* If machinery, intended to work in normal atmosphere is transferred into dangerous environment  or into places with specific requirements.
* If the intended user group for the modified machinery changes, in particular in case of specific machinery for experts
* If original machinery is assembled with other machinery to an integrated unit, functioning in this combination as one new whole machine (see Annex pt.2.2 Assembly - "Complex combination").

The CEOC International guidelines therefore leave no doubt as to what constitutes a 'substantial' change and the action that should be taken. If your machine is shown to have had a substantial change made, a full CE marking and PUWER assessment must be completed before that machine can be returned to service.

Download pdf

Other News from TUV SUD Product Service

Protection from lithium-ion battery fires

Latest news about Machine Building

Additional Information
Text styles