Industrial Technology - Linked-in Industrial Technology - Twitter Industrial Technology - News Feed
Latest Issue
Diary and Events

Southern Manufacturing

Farnborough, Hants(GU14 6TQ)

20/04/2021 - 22/04/2021

Southern Manufacturing and Electronics is the most comprehensive annual industrial exhibition in the (more)

PPMA Show 2021

NEC, Birmingham(B40 1NT)

28/09/2021 - 30/09/2021

PPMA Show 2021 will be the UK’s largest ever event dedicated to state-of-the-art processing and (more)

Advanced Engineering 2021

NEC Birmingham(B40 1NT)

03/11/2021 - 04/11/2021

Join us in our 12th and most important edition to date, as we invite engineers and management from all (more)

Stopping danger in time

Stopping danger in time Seb Strutt, safety specialist at Sick UK examines how machine designers can remove the uncertainty in determining the safe stop time of a potentially hazardous movement.

On any machine or automated process, expert analysis of the operation will identify  movements which comprise the key elements of a hazard. These are the elements which could simply be expressed as constituting 'clear and present danger' to the operator.

This danger means that there is no room for complacency where moving machinery and the operating personnel are concerned. Although successive machinery safety legislation and associated technical standards in the EU have led to one of the most comprehensive safety regimes in the world, we still cannot sit back and assume all is right.

The introduction of BS EN ISO 13855:2010 'Safety of machinery - positioning of safeguards with respect to the approach speeds of parts of the human body', highlighted how machinery operators might put their safety at risk, without knowing it. In the same way as the reaction speed of a car's airbag under crash conditions is critical to harm limitation, so a machine designer must ensure a protective measure can react in time. Incorrect positioning of the safety device is one of the most common reasons for compliance failure. At Sick, we have observed this on countless occasions during initial safety inspections. Yet the provisions and implementation are simple and compliance can easily be achieved.

The standard BS EN ISO 13855:2010 is an excellent step forward, and fills an important gap in the previous standard.  What must be accurately measured, by a competent person is the distance from the hazard point to the safety device and its orientation relative to the hazard. However, the precision required for complex safe distance calculations and the need for accuracy in estimating the safe stop time of the hazardous movement can be critical to achieving safety compliance.

Manufacturer-derived safety distance calculation tools and stop time measurement services can remove the uncertainty from the required measurements, and establish the exact distances needed for compliance. By taking advantage of these, or using measurement services, the engineer can gain peace of mind and reduce the risk of accident. Identifying the minimum safe distance measurement is critical. At Sick we believe this to be so important that we offer our customers a stop time calculation service prior to and following installation of new safety measures.

Positioning preventive devices
BS EN ISO13855 applies to safety light curtains as well as to other preventative measures such as pressure sensitive mats, two-hand control systems and interlocking guards without guard locking. In simple terms, the standard is intended to ensure accessible hazards with mechanical movement are protected by an electro sensitive protective device (ESPE). This device can detect an approach to the hazard and initiate a stop command which brings the mechanical motion to a safe condition before the operative can reach the hazard.

A good example is a typical hand-fed machine press. In the event that work is misplaced, a common operator response is to try to grab the item during the down stroke of the press. The desire to save on wastage, and reduce penalties on piece rate wages, could be dangerous. The operator's hand speed could easily reach two metres a second. If the protective light curtain is positioned too close to the press a hand could reach the hazardous zone before the press can react to the curtain's stop command, the consequences could be devastating.  

Calculating the correct safety distance to prevent such injury is critical. For a vertical light curtain, the safety distance (Safety reach through, or Srt) is calculated from the Speed of approach (K) multiplied by total response time of the machine (T) plus a constant (C) dependent on the specification of the light curtain: Srt = (K*T) + C. With a full body access detection multiple beam light guard (typically three or four beams), the equation becomes, Srt = (K * T) + 850mm. When using multiple beams, the minimum safety distance should be greater than 850mm to accommodate the arm length when reaching through the light beam grid.

The standard also describes the calculations to be performed when correctly positioning horizontal light curtains, safety mats and two-hand controls. The orientation and mounting height of the devices are important parameters in the calculation.

The completely new element of the 2010 standards tackled the problem of operators reaching over light curtains. The height of the hazard from ground level, when reaching from a standing position, is a major deciding factor in the height of the top beam of the light curtain. The reach over safety distance (Sro) is calculated by adding a specially measured constant (Cro) into the equation, Sro = (K*T) + Cro.

Cro is derived from the table opposite. Essentially, as a ready guide, areas of the table marked '0' show where the hazard cannot be accessed by overreaching. This means a hazard height of 800mm, with the upper edge of the light curtain detection zone at 1600mm, cannot be accessed by overreaching. The standard tackles in more detail under reach and indirect reach into hazardous areas.

If the standard Srt safety distance is also calculated for the set up, the resultant safety distance adopted should be whichever is greater; Srt or Sro. The results can be attached to the machine under scrutiny, as an immediate guide to its safe operation and safety status.
Download pdf

Other News from Sick (UK) Ltd

Connected safety for improved productivity

Latest news about Safety products

Additional Information
Text styles